The
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday told a Federal
High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice John Tsoho, that the oil
block prospecting licence known as OPL 245 was illegally and
fraudulently acquired by Malabu Oil & Gas Limited.
The anti-graft agency also alleged that
former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice (AGF),
Mohammed Adoke, facilitated the payment of $1.2bn bribe to Chief Dan
Etete, former Minister of Petroleum Resources.
The disclosures from the EFCC were
contained in its counter-affidavit in opposition to the applications
brought by Nigerian Agip Exploration Limited and Shell Nigeria
Exploration and Production Company Ltd, praying the court to vacate its
order of forfeiture made against them in respect of OPL 245 prospecting
licence.
In a counter-affidavit moved by counsel
to the EFCC, Ojogbane Johnson, the commission urged the court to refuse
the applications, as granting it would be prejudicial to the respondent
(EFCC).
In its counter-affidavit, dated February 24, 2017, the EFCC gave a historic background of how the transaction occurred.
It further disclosed how the applicants
conspired with Adoke to acquire the already illegally acquired assets
OPL 245, knowing that Malabu’s interest in OPL 245 was unlawful. In the
counter-affidavit, with 36 paragraphs, the EFCC claimed that Shell was
fully aware that the allocation of the oil well and procedures adopted
by the owners of Malabu Oil & Gas Ltd were fraught with fraud but
went ahead to consummate the transaction.
The commission stated that, sometime in
April 1998, Malabu was incorporated in Nigeria, with shareholders
Mohammed Sani, fronting for the then Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha,
Kwejwu Amafegha, representing Dan Etete, then Minister of Petroleum
Resources, and Hassan Hindu, on behalf of Hassan Adamu.
In April 1998, the EFCC said, the company
was incorporated, with the Federal Ministry of Petroleum Resources
offering it the deep water oil block prospecting licence, known as OPL
245, in line with the Federal Government’s indigenous policy in the
upstream sector.
The counter-affidavit deposed to by
Ibrahim Ahmed averred that, against all known government regulations,
the oil prospecting licence, was awarded to Malabu Oil & Gas, even
before a formal application was submitted by the company.
The EFCC said, in June 1998, Abacha died
and, between 1999 and 2000, the corporate status and shareholding
structure were altered severally, through forged board resolutions,
which eventually divested Mohammed Sani of his shares, while new
shareholders and directors were appointed fraudulently.
Also, at the time the company was
incorporated, Abacha and Etete were Head of State and Minister of
Petroleum Resources respectively, while Hassan Adamu was the Nigerian
ambassador to the United States of America, between 1996 and 1999.
The EFCC said at the time of the
company’s incorporation, Abacha, Etete and Adamu were barred by extant
laws from engaging in any form of business by virtue of their offices.
Therefore, they used their positions to confer unfair advantage on
themselves and cronies, in allocating OPL 245 to themselves without due
process.
The affidavit added that the company
contracted Shell Petroleum and SNEPCO, in a joint venture scheme, for
the purpose of prospecting and operating the said licence given by the
Federal Government.
Furthermore, the EFCC told the court
that, following instructions from Adoke, money was transferred from
escrow accounts operated by Etete and Malabu in First Bank and Keystone
Bank.
Investigations by the EFCC also showed
that the Federal Government was defrauded by SPDC and Malabu Oil &
Gas Ltd by underpaying the sum of $210 million as signature bonus on OPL
245.
The EFCC’s investigation further revealed
that the applicants allegedly conspired with Adoke to acquire the
already illegally acquired assets OPL 245, knowing that Malabu’s
interest in OPL 245 was unlawful.
Earlier, counsel to the applicants, Prof.
Konyinsola Ajayi (SAN) and Babatunde Fagbohundu (SAN), had urged the
court to vacate its forfeiture order against their clients on the
grounds that it was obtained in breach of the constitutional rights of
fair hearing.
Ajayi, who stood in for Shell Nigeria
Exploration and Production Company Limited, submitted that the order,
having been obtained in ex parte proceedings, should be vacated, as his
clients were denied fair hearing.
Meanwhile, the court has fixed March 13, 2017, for ruling.
Culled from Sun
No comments:
Post a Comment