Tobi Soniyi in Abuja
In a statement that is capable of being
interpreted to mean that he has made up his mind to convict the Senate
President, Dr Bukola Saraki, at all costs, the Code of Conduct Tribunal
((CCT) Chairman, Mr. Danladi Umar, on Tuesday said that Saraki would
face the full consequences of the charges of alleged false declaration
of assets brought against him by the federal government in spite of
alleged delay of his trial.
The tribunal chairman, who was reacting
to the allegation of delay tactics by the prosecution counsel, Mr.
Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), against Saraki’s lawyer, said that the consequences
of the trial and the charges would in no way be reduced on the accused
person by his tribunal.
Umar, who spoke just before the defence
counsel, Mr. Paul Usoro (SAN), was about to begin the cross-examination
of the prosecution witness, Mr. Michael Wetkas, said that he had taken
note of the delay tactics being employed by Saraki’s lawyers and warned
that the tactics would not in any way affect the consequences of the
trial of the defendant.
“I am not happy at the delay tactics
employed by the defence counsel. And I must say this thing out that this
delay tactics will not reduce the consequences the defendant will meet
from this tribunal at the end of the trial,” he said.
However, Saraki’s lead counsel, Mr. Kanu
Agabi (SAN), who was taken aback by the remark of the CCT chairman, got
up and asked the chairman what he meant by the consequences of the
tribunal.
Agabi told the tribunal chairman that he and his client were worried over “assumed prejudices”.
Agabi told the tribunal chairman that he and his client were worried over “assumed prejudices”.
The former Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) cautioned the
tribunal against influence from opposition and enemies, adding that the
defence team was against “assumed prejudices” as it is against justice.
“From the defence side, we are not
worried about the law and facts that will be placed before this tribunal
by the prosecution. But we are worried about enemies who may wish to
use this tribunal to achieve their ulterior motives.
“As the tribunal chairman, we love you,
we respect you, but we are afraid of consequences, especially as just
stated by this tribunal this morning. Our fears have been reinforced,
but we pray against consequences that are against natural justice,”
Agabi said.
Apparently overwhelmed by the spontaneous reaction of lawyers to his remarks, the chairman then said nobody would be prejudiced.
Apparently overwhelmed by the spontaneous reaction of lawyers to his remarks, the chairman then said nobody would be prejudiced.
Later, under cross-examination by
Saraki’s lawyer, Mr Paul Usoro (SAN), the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC) witness, Wetkas, told the tribunal that Saraki was
never investigated by EFCC on the ownership of two properties in Abuja
which he allegedly failed to declare in his assets declaration form.
The witness said that their assumption that Saraki was the owner of the properties — Plot 2482 and Plot 2481 Maitama, Abuja — was based on information obtained from the Managing Director of Carlisle Properties Ltd whose name he could not remember.
The witness said that their assumption that Saraki was the owner of the properties — Plot 2482 and Plot 2481 Maitama, Abuja — was based on information obtained from the Managing Director of Carlisle Properties Ltd whose name he could not remember.
When the Certificate of Incorporation of
Carlisle issued by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) was shown to
him and he was asked to read it out, the witness admitted that the two
properties belonged to a registered company, Carlisle, and that they
were acquired in 1993, 10 years before Saraki became the governor of
Kwara State.
He also admitted that the name of the
defendant was not mentioned in the acquisition documents executed by one
Alhaji Attahiru Adamu and Carlisle Properties who were the sellers and
buyers of the said property respectively.
Answering a question, the witness said:
“My duty as an EFCC operative is to look for economic and financial
crimes and not to investigate asset declaration matters.”
Meanwhile, further cross-examination of the witness has been adjourned till 15 June.
Also, the tribunal chairman has advocated the return of Decree Number 2 to curb the alleged excesses of journalists in the country.
Meanwhile, further cross-examination of the witness has been adjourned till 15 June.
Also, the tribunal chairman has advocated the return of Decree Number 2 to curb the alleged excesses of journalists in the country.
Speaking at the end of yesterday’s
proceedings, Umar, who could not hide his disdain for journalists, said:
“Journalists should be punished” for publishing falsehood, “it is a
criminal offence.”
Umar said that his position was informed by last week’s publication in some newspapers to the effect that the tribunal had adjourned the trial of the Senate president indefinitely.
Umar said that his position was informed by last week’s publication in some newspapers to the effect that the tribunal had adjourned the trial of the Senate president indefinitely.
Apparently angered by the publication,
the CCT chairman accused journalists of practising irresponsible
journalism that was in bad taste for him and for his tribunal.
He said: “If I have my way, I would bring back the decree 2 of the olden days to take care of the irresponsible journalists in this country.
He said: “If I have my way, I would bring back the decree 2 of the olden days to take care of the irresponsible journalists in this country.
“How can they dare to publish that we
have adjourned the trial of this defendant (Saraki) indefinitely? It is
the highest point of irresponsible journalism, but I thank God for them
that we are in a democratic era and that is why they are doing what they
are doing now.
“They are embarking on sensational
journalism to sell their newspapers at the expense of truth, but that is
not journalism but a serious crime that can lead them to jail.”
During the military administration of General Muhammadu Buhari, Decree Number 2 gave the Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters the power to detain journalists for up to six months without trial or anyone considered a security risk.
During the military administration of General Muhammadu Buhari, Decree Number 2 gave the Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters the power to detain journalists for up to six months without trial or anyone considered a security risk.
At the time, special military tribunals
increasingly replaced law courts while the state security agency, the
National Security Organisation (NSO), were given greater powers.
However, responding to the remark of the CCT Boss, the lead counsel to Saraki, Agabi, said that he admired journalists a lot because of their contributions to the enthronement of democracy in this country.
Agabi told the CCT chairman that what Nigeria needed was peace and not decree 2 and urged that all Nigerians should pray for peace rather than anything that could disturb the peace of the nation.
However, responding to the remark of the CCT Boss, the lead counsel to Saraki, Agabi, said that he admired journalists a lot because of their contributions to the enthronement of democracy in this country.
Agabi told the CCT chairman that what Nigeria needed was peace and not decree 2 and urged that all Nigerians should pray for peace rather than anything that could disturb the peace of the nation.
Culled from Thisday
No comments:
Post a Comment